Clear Eyes,

Full Hearts, Can't Use* ?

It is unclear what the Romney ticket is going with, Mo'better Bush or Mo'better Obama, but certainly not No Drama Either or is it ether?  Somewhere the Romney/Ryan/RNC use of the term quarterback escapes me.  Even if it was just me, I think that Monday morning or anyday other day than game day is their style. 

* was going to go with caffeinated but that was too Mormoney. 

(Tagg we are it ?)
Replacement Refs or Not...  (Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... ** )

===============
10-18-12
RETRO_SEG_WAY?
UNCLE SAM KNOT?
Or Fair and Balanced, not ? !
Or Just US!
=========

** updated, Thom Hartmann(Bu'), Norman Goldman(Dump), Randi Rhodes ('ump) (Bu' dump 'ump)/Re:tale.
Re:R,R,R A - R(not exactly) (j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r )

Not to Dump on Norman Goldman(nor Republicans), he is describing RepubliCONS as smart and fighting like cats and dogs over congress, while compromise is only for the president as candidate.  He makes further cracks about the difficulties of Bozo John Boehner as House Speaker in hurding*** them. (my paraphrasing & rhetorical metamorphing.)

*** circular firing rhetorical metaphors(cats and dogs)
(Obama has a better record given his opposition, Romney had to cooperated with a 78% Democratic legislature which has the power.***) Yeah that asterisk is redundant... who needs Republicans when ...  democracy is all over the map?)

[Bin Go ! Who let  the names out? Con $(c)ent Ration ? (C S c R !) ]

Preface to FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012

Jolly Roger?  October Motif?
R,R,R! Or Simon Says?  (Right off the bat...)(*fn) 

September(**fn) Archive.
closing 10-1-12 Forward to FOOTNOTES: continue here: FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012  ]


NOT TO MITT-FLOP: but I will process the footnotes scrolling down in time as opposed to September's format.

[[]]
10-1-12
IN FACT SCRATCH THIS AS PREFACE OF SORTS.
[EDITOR"S NOTE: SEE FOOTNOTES OCTOBER 2012 Continued there. ]
10-1-12
[[]]

[]
[10-1-12 preemptive post to month of October.]
(*fn) =footnote on (FOOTNOTES OCTOBER...)
[bat= pun on Halloween and my going right off track with the footnotes protocol]
Not to trickle-down. (Scroll over for Ribble?)
B'log Search(b.s.): jolly + roger ( a, b )
October: Walking the Plank[!]
Motif: (b.s.) PEG'd ( a , b )
(**fn) Still some in draft for September.
(Ribble= ribbing/riddle  Hint: a bit of a pin the foot on the pirate.)
[] braketed close of asterisks to Forward.


FLASHNOTE: 10-5-12  http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/presidential-debate-top-7-romney-comments-youd-swear-he-could-never-have-said-but-did/news/2012/10/03/50276NOT!  OCTOBER NO SUPRISE!
Nor: http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2012/10/04/958801/at-last-nights-debate-romney-told-27-myths-in-38-minutes/

First Debate: Zinger Score 2 to -1:  (comcast log)"take" etc.
Tough reviews for Jim Lehrer as debate moderator.
Romney barrels out of first debate on offense.
FACT CHECK: Presidential debate missteps.
Obama: Jobs report shows economy is on right track.>?
What the?  Ouch* < ! 

Replacement Refs or Not... 
I can't keep up with the debate ball of wax, or FOX-coop and egg heading. 
Post Ouch^*:
"spiracy":The Vice President Rolls
"math+godliness": My Respects to Those who Celebrate.
Might be maybe?

10-7-12 <*> "debate" http://xfinity.comcast.net/video/McCain-Romney-wins-first-debate-but-/2287378762/FoxNews/newest/ <*> 

Replacement Refs or Not...

If it were a debate* we would have stopped it. 
Not to pun on Xfinity, but while the Comcast links*** will expire.**,
it's the congress John!  Bring it on, Joe!  The President needs to hold a Sit Down.

Before I get down to the task of preserving<*> those links whether read or not, I will explain the Rogue John and Wax Leak of the asterisks.  Although the lesson learned from "Simon says"^^ might be to actually read links more thoroughly, the lesson from the Debate may be more complex but parallel of sorts.  By "rogue",<*> I mean that former Presidential Candidate McCain(first link) confesses an expectation for him lowering the expectations of Paul Ryan, while  disrespecting the Vice President and framing an expectation for gaffs.  Then in regard to the " ball of wax " that Palin leaks, it connects the "boys" to the other "race" speech.^^^  (There, that's the GPS-uncross-Rhodes.)

And a far as my Tan Gents(Dr. Trumps), being a Seahawk fan has nothing to do with my take on the moderator.  Well, who knows?  But Mr. Lerrer has been critcized for not moderating or having a good performance, but I think that given the style over substance versus substance with style, these are not legitimate debates.  And within the political system (such as it is) it was not his job to interfere with the players being themselves in order to let them make the proper contrast.  Again having only heard most of the debate on the radio, I thought that the President walked away with it, but that was under the condition that facts matter.  Neither he nor Lehrer could have done a better job in the case that they don't. 

BTW^: Speaking of "boys", we have heard cracks about the Harvard "professor" and I suspect he has had to deal with a few wise-guys or gulls[!]

*if the link were fact checked...ditto.
(McCain goes rogue.)(Palin leaks ball of wax .)
** not that I have read them yet or the recommend them.
***The point of this lede and the heading...

^ apologies to literary geeks for my style over elements.(But that was Core Knell.) 
^^ added in edit mode
^^^ to be expanded later(but see lede and stupid...I mean congress and John, Joe & Ryan. i.e. the context of the politics of "relief' legislation.)
[In the spirit of medium...? ]
[Not to parse too acutely, but it is the medium and the mess age.]
(Bu' dump 'ump [!] ... )
Re:Ouch?(see FLASHNOTE)
Post-Subjectivism?  Might it be, rational subjectivism?

<*> 10-7-12(See FLASHNOTE: under construction)
<*> 10-9-12  slight edit ( "r.... ",)